Documents and PDFs
Make your digital documents scannable, searchable, legible, and readable.
Office of Information Technology
Make your digital documents scannable, searchable, legible, and readable.
Use multiple means of representation, engagement, actions, and expressions in your classroom activities.
Simplify tables and include a header row and/or column and a summary, either in a caption or alt text.
Add alternative text, or “alt text,” to every meaningful image in digital content.
Make sure foreground and background colors and other visual indicators contrast each other.
You should frequently assess the accessibility of your digital content, such as a single document or web page, a web site, or an entire domain. A thorough process includes both the use of automated tools and manual assessments conducted by knowledgeable humans.
The Web Accessibility Initiative provides a guide to evaluating web accessibility that includes information about manual assessment methods.
Beginning in spring 2020, instructors can use the Universal Design Online Content Inspection Tool (UDOIT) tool to identify accessibility issues in an entire Canvas course site, plus get suggestions about how to fix the issues .
Accessibility checkers highlight areas in your document that might be problematic for people with disabilities, as well as for anyone using assistive technology. Accessibility checkers can:
Accessibility checkers cannot find all accessibility issues. In addition, accessibility checkers won't be able to tell you whether your content makes sense or is out of date. Accessibility checkers and critical thinking must work in tandem to create an accessible document.
Tool | Description | Resources |
---|---|---|
Microsoft Word accessibility tool | A built-in feature that is one of the quickest ways to check your document; works with any version of Word that was released after 2010 | Consult the list of rules for Microsoft's Accessibility Checker. |
Google Docs | At present, Google Docs does not have a built-in accessibility checker, but one way to check your Google Doc is to use the accessibility checker built into Microsoft Word |
|
Walks users through accessibility fixes for content created in some Google Apps; not currently available to accounts managed by the University of Minnesota, but you can try them with a personal account |
Testing with a keyboard is an essential part of any accessibility evaluation. In order to use a screen reader it also is necessary to learn some simple keyboard commands.
See WebAIM's Keyboard Testing.
A screen reader is software that enables people who are blind or have low vision to use a computer. When considering web accessibility it is helpful to have an idea how a blind person uses the web.
There are several screen readers available. At the University of Minnesota we officially support the two described below.
Tool | Description | Resources |
---|---|---|
JAWS (Job Access with Speech for Windows) | Windows-based application that captures text-based output and speaks it using synthesized speech AKA: Text To Speech (TTS), or sends it to a refreshable Braille display; Hotkey combinations provide access to reading, navigational, and system controls | |
VoiceOver for Mac | Apple OSX and iOS application that captures text-based output and speaks it using synthesized speech AKA: Text To Speech (TTS), or sends it to a refreshable Braille display; Hotkey combinations or finger gestures provide access to reading, navigational, and system controls | Voiceover Getting Started |
The Computer Accommodations Program offers adaptive technology services to members of the university community, including services related to JAWS and VoiceOver. Email [email protected] for more information.
A Web accessibility audit assesses the accessibility of a web page, a web site, or an entire domain. A thorough audit includes the use of both automated tools and manual assessments. An audit identifies issues such as:
The most popular and easiest to use audit tools are listed in the table below. Depending on the complexity of the page and the tool you use, it may take from 1 to 30 minutes to evaluate a page, site, or domain.
While these tools provide fairly comprehensive checks, some issues can only be detected manually, such as:
Tool | Description | Resources |
---|---|---|
Pope Tech | Website editors can use Pope Tech to scan a website or single web page for accessibility issues and see a report of specific errors along with their exact location | See the Pope Tech page for UMN self-help resources. |
WAVE Browser Extensions or WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool | A free tool available as an extension for Chrome or Firefox or a web-based tool that helps you evaluate the accessibility of web content; the extensions provide more thorough results than the web-based tool below |
|
Functional Accessibility Evaluator (FAE) | An open source, no cost tool that analyzes web pages for accessibility and offers coding support; you must register for an account, but no download is required | See the About section on the FAE site, such as the Getting Started page. |
AInspector Sidebar for Firefox | A Firefox plug-in that evaluates a single page, but allows you to drill down to the element level and inspect the markup; also provides the ability to evaluate web applications when the content of the page is changing based on user interactions or other events | See user guides on the AInspector Sidebar site. |
The University of Minnesota is committed to providing equitable access to information technology, digital materials, services and the environments in which information technology is used. All colleges, departments, central units and faculty are responsible for ensuring access to their Web content, Web applications, digital materials, environments and services to the greatest extent possible....
University of Minnesota Accessibility of Information Technology Policy
The policy applies to electronic information resources, technologies, and services for students, employees, guests, and visitors, including those who have disabilities.
Ensuring access means that a person with a disability must be afforded the same opportunities as a person without a disability to:
Our accessibility policy encompasses:
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) created by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) are largely regarded as the international standard for accessibility.
The University's policy specifies that we implement and adhere to the W3C WCAG 2.1 level AA and ARIA 1 guidelines. You can learn more about these guidelines in several ways:
Making your digital materials accessible directly impacts anyone with a disability. It also helps:
In addition:
In the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the United Nations calls upon countries to “promote access to information by providing information intended for the general public in accessible formats and technologies (Article 21).” Designing your digital materials with accessibility in mind helps you meet the fundamental right to information for a much broader population.
Accessibility is proactive; accommodation is reactive. When you make accessible choices now, you will be able to support accommodations more quickly, cheaply, and effectively in the future.
When you use correct headings or add alt text to images, those changes are saved. If you are pasting content from a Google Doc into a Canvas site, for example, the heading structure will remain intact. Creating content accessibly in the first place will save you time when you move that content into different tools or formats.
Under federal law, students with disabilities are guaranteed equally effective learning opportunities as students without disabilities. When you create accessible content, you help the University live up to the letter and the spirit of these laws and reduce the risk of legal consequences.
Creating accessible websites and digital materials reduces barriers and ensures that all users who encounter your materials can understand and interact with them.
Websites and digital materials that are not designed with accessibility in mind exclude a significant population of potential users from participating in an internet-dependent world. Unfortunately, information exclusion is a barrier people with disabilities experience on a daily basis.
Accessibility is often discussed in the context of disability. If we're going to talk about accessibility, we need to consider how we understand disability first.
People often classify disabilities by individual physical traits or function:
This model of classifying disabilities comes from a way of thinking known as the medical model. It sees disability as an individual problem to be fixed by medical professionals.
This model defines disability as a sign of moral or religious failing - not doing enough of the right things.
This model defines a disability as a tragedy. People with disabilities should be pitied and "taken care of," often away from the public eye.
This model believes that people with disabilities should work hard to appear as "able" as possible, to avoid discomfort or inconvenience to individuals who do not experience the disability.
The models of disability described in the previous sections are inappropriate. They do not contribute to the kind of equitable and inclusive society that we strive for at the University of Minnesota.
A different way of thinking about disability began to emerge in the 1970s, when people with disabilities began publicly reflecting on their own realities. It is known as the Social Model of Disability.
In this way of thinking, disability is defined by the decisions that society makes about what makes bodies and minds valuable. Society's ideas then lead to decisions about physical spaces, technologies, laws, and policies. Those spaces, laws, and policies often exclude and discriminate against people whose minds and bodies function differently.
In the social model of disability, society can amplify exclusion and discrimination against people with disabilities; but society also can encourage people to design a world that works well for a wider range of bodies and minds. When understood in this light, every person is responsible for contributing to the accessibility of the environment that we all share.
This number is difficult to estimate. Many people are hesitant to disclose disabilities or don’t consider their impairments to be disabilities. According to the World Report on Disability (2011), about 20% of the world’s population experience some form of disability. The report also notes that people with disabilities have, as compared to those without disabilities:
These negative outcomes are often linked to barriers in accessing services. The United States Census Bureau reports similar statistics with 19% of U.S. citizens disclosing the presence of a disability.
In March 2017, the Minnesota State Demographic Center reports that about 10.9% of the population in Minnesota has one or more disabilities, according to the Minnesotans with Disabilities report. The most common types are:
Age and geographic differences are wide. Disability is strongly associated with aging, so disabilities across counties varies from 6.1% in Carver County to 18.3% in Aitkin County. Minneapolis has the most people with disabilities of all cities.
Wide disparities in prevalence exist across race and cultural groups. Among typical working-age populations, disability rates range from 18-22% for Ojibwe, African-American, and Dakota populations to below 5% for Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, and Russian populations.
In this typical working-age group, persons with disabilities are:
As of 2019, over 4,000 students are registered with disability resource centers and offices across the University of Minnesota's campuses.
But these are just the tip of the iceberg, because nationally, 19.4% of undergraduates and 11.9% of graduates reported having a disability in 2015–2016, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
In addition, many faculty and staff members also use accommodations and experience disabilities.
For all members of the University community, the numbers reported are artificially low because:
Disabilities can be apparent to you—or not. Disabilities can be permanent. There are also impairments that can be temporary or situational.
For instance:
All are affected by access barriers, but the person with a permanent disability also has an unequal experience based on how society views and stigmatizes some bodies and minds, according to the social model of disability.
If you consider the wide range of disabilities and impairments as you design materials, you can extend access to more people in new ways.
A piece of technology is only as accessible as its least accessible component.
Users with disabilities often get most of the way through a process, only to find that the end product—an inaccessible table, PDF, or online form—is unavailable to them because it lacks accessibility features.
Even when technology is created with accessibility in mind, users with disabilities continue to experience barriers and exclusion. It is up to all individuals to make materials accessible to everyone. In doing so, we will not only create a society of inclusion, but everyone will benefit from the increase in access.
Creating accessible digital materials—ranging from an accessible Word doc or syllabus to an organizational website to choosing an enterprise level software tool—is a basic human right recognized in the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
The UN specifically calls upon countries to “promote access to information by providing information intended for the general public in accessible formats and technologies” and “encouraging the media and Internet providers to make online information available in accessible formats (Article 21).”
The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. Title II of the ADA requires that State and local governments (including the U of M) give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 1990. Section 504 of this law prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs and activities receiving financial assistance from the federal government by:
Section 504 states that "no qualified individual with a disability in the United States shall be excluded from, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under" any program or activity that either receives Federal financial assistance or is conducted by any Executive agency or the United States Postal Service.
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 mandated that "all electronic and information technology used by the federal government be accessible to people with disabilities." Although the original intent of Section 508 was to provide accessibility in the federal sector, it has been widely accepted that colleges and universities are subject to its requirements under Title II because they almost universally receive some form of federal funding.
Section 504 includes provisions for individuals with disabilities to participate in programs and services with the use of auxiliary aids, where necessary. These aids are commonly referred to as accommodations. On the other hand, Section 508 requires that persons with disabilities have comparable access to and use of information and communication technology (ICT) — a subtle but meaningful distinction.
An accommodation is…
Accessibility is…
It's important to note that higher education institutions across the country have had complaints filed against them for the inaccessibility of their digital resources.
Many of these complaints have resulted in settlement agreements between the institutions and either the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights or the U.S. Department of Justice, both of which share enforcement responsibilities for the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
The University of Minnesota Duluth maintains a fairly comprehensive list of those settlement agreements.